Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-077 - MedVision Inc et al v. Medigain LLC et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-077 - MedVision Inc et al v. Medigain LLC et al
February 1, 2016
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The undersigned respectfully recommends that the District Court GRANT the 97 Motion to Withdraw and Substitute and 120 Unopposed Motion to Substitute. The undersigned recommends that the District Court permit (1) Michael K. Hurst, Jonathan R. Childers, Christina M. Mullen, and the law firm of Gruber Hurst Elrod Johansen Hail Shank, LLP to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendants; (2) substitute Michael S. Gardner and Eric P. Haas of Gardner Haas, PLLC as counsel of record for Hackney; and (3) substitute Kristin A. Regel and the Law Offices of Kenneth G. Wincorn & Associates, PC as counsel of record for Butani Capital and Butani. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 2/1/2016) (mcrd)
February 23, 2016
PDF | More
Order Accepting 125 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court grants Defendant Butani Capital Investment Fund II, LLC's and Dinesh K. Butani's Unopposed Motion for Substitution of Counsel (Doc. 120) and allows Jonathan R. Childers, Michael K. Hurst, Steven W. Hopkins, and the law firm of Gruber Hurst Elrod Johansen Hail Shank LLP to withdraw as their counsel of record. Kristin A. Regel and The Law Offices of Kenneth G. Wincorn & Associates, P.C. are substituted as counsel for Defendants Butani Capital Investment Fund II, LLC and Dinesh K. Butani. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 2/23/2016) (axm)
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting as herein modified the 140 Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The court rejects the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions regarding an agreed judgment; accepts the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions that Plaintiffs have not established an uncured default by Defendants; and accepts the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions regarding Plaintiffs' request for attorney's fees and sanctions. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Objections to Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 158) is granted, and the clerk shall file under seal with a file date of 9/7/2016. The parties are, therefore, directed to file by 5/1/2017, a joint stipulation or notice of dismissal of this action or an agreed motion to dismiss. The court denies Plaintiffs' Motions (Docs. 100, 115). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/31/2017) (ndt)