Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-1071 - Sprint Communications Company LP v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-1071 - Sprint Communications Company LP v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company et al
September 22, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/22/14 GRANTING 25 Motion to Sever and Change Venue. Surewest Telephone and Surewest Televideo are hereby SEVERED and this case is TRANSFERRED to the Central District of Illinois as to defendants Surewest Telephone and Surewest Televideo only. Sprint Communications shall remain the plaintiff and Verizon California, Inc. and Pacific Bell Telephone Company shall remain the defendants in this action in this court. (Manzer, C)[Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 4/8/2015.]
October 8, 2014
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 10/8/14 ORDERING that Verizon's time to answer or otherwise respond to Sprint's Complaint is EXTENDED until October 15, 2014. (Kastilahn, A)[Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 4/8/2015.]
October 14, 2014
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/14/2014. Verizon California Inc.'s 42 Motion to Sever and to Transfer Venue shall be decided on record and Briefs on file without oral argument. The 10/30/2014 Hearing date for this Motion is VACATED. The time to decide Motion to Sever and Transfer is SHORTENED so Court may decide Motion forthwith. All parties have stated they do not oppose Motion. (Marciel, M) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 4/8/2015.]
October 14, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/14/2014. (1) Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company L.P.' s claims against defendant Verizon California Inc. are hereby SEVERED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. It is further ORDERED this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United StatesDistrict Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, as to Defendant Verizon California Inc. only. Clerk is DIRECTED to take all steps necessary to effectuate this transfer. After transfer of defendant Verizon California Inc. as set forth above. Sprint Communications Company L.P. SHALL REMAIN the plaintiff and Pacific Bell Telephone Company, doing business as AT&T California, SHALL REMAIN the defendant in action in United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (Marciel, M) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 4/8/2015.]
November 3, 2014
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status memorandum within 10 days of the date of this Order advising me whether they intend to move for consolidation and/or a stay of this case. In the alternative, the parties may notify me of a pending motion for consolidation or file appropriate motions for stay within 10 days of the date of this Order.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/3/14. (LGK) [Transferred from Missouri Eastern on 4/8/2015.]
November 17, 2015
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants' Lead Counsel, Defendants' Liaison Counsel, with leave to replead plaintiffs' state-law claims; denying MOTION to Dismiss on Primary Jurisdiction Grounds or, in the Alternative, for Stay Pending Referral. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 11/17/2015) (gr)
March 16, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The balance of defendants' 12/8/15 motion for leave to file counterclaims, for order establishing related procedures, and for status conference is granted. Plaintiffs' 12/10/15 request for extension of time to replead state claims is granted. And plaintiffs' 12/22/15 motion for final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), or, in the alternative, for certification review under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1292, and for stay pending appeal is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/16/2016) (ash)
May 3, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court grants defendants' motions to dismiss Sprint's amended complaints under Rule 12(b)(6), and it dismisses Sprint's state-law claims with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 5/3/2017) (axm)
May 15, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: In these MDL proceedings, the court decides three pending motions for summary judgment (280 in 3:14-md-02587-D; 285 in 3:14-md-02587-D; 46 in 3:16-cv-02210-D) under an abbreviated summary judgment procedure that is appropriate under the circumstances to facilitate an appeal of the court's case-dispositive decision in In re IntraMTA Switched Access Charges Litigation, 2015 WL 7252948 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2015) (Fitzwater, J.) ("IntraMTA I"). The LECs's motions for summary judgment are granted, and the parties are ordered to file final judgments within seven days. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 5/15/2018) (axm)