Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-055 - Johnson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-055 - Johnson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
March 2, 2016
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 should be TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to Henderson v. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. 2002) and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997). Petitioner should also be ADMONISHED that he may be subject to sanctions if he continues to raise claims that were or could have been raised in his previous federal petition in this Court without first seeking and receiving authorization from the Fifth Circuit to file a successive petition. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/2/2016) (mcrd)
March 22, 2016
PDF | More
clusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Court hereby TRANSFERS the petition for habeas corpus to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to Henderson v. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability re: 9 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Elloyd Johnson. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Con 2002) and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997). The petitioner is further ADMONISHED that he may be subject to sanctions if he continues to raise claims that were or could have been raised in his previous federal petition in this Court without first seeking and receiving authorization from the Fifth Circuit to file a successive petition. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/22/2016) (ndt) Modified on 3/22/2016 (ndt). (Main Document 13 replaced on 3/23/2016) (ndt).
March 22, 2016
PDF | More
JUDGMENT: This action came on for consideration by the Court, and the issues having been duly considered and a decision duly rendered, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 1. The petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit pursuant to Henderson v. Haro, 282 F.3d 862, 864 (5th Cir. 2002) and In re Epps, 127 F.3d 364, 365 (5th Cir. 1997). 2. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment and the Order Accepting the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to all parties. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/22/2016) (ndt)
November 27, 2017
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the petitioner's 29 Leave for Relief from a Judgment, Order, Clerical Mistake and Misconduct by an Opposing Party Under Rule 60(a) and (b) of Fed. R. Civ. Proc. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the motion should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/27/2017) (mcrd)
December 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER accepting 30 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation; denying Certificate of Appealability. The 29 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 12/15/2017) (ran)
January 5, 2018
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations re the petitioner's 33 Leave to Reconsider the Denial of Certificate of Appealability: Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/5/2018) (mcrd)
January 26, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The motion for certificate of appealability (doc. 33) is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/26/2018) (axm)