Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-1287 - Garland v. DSCC Director et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-1287 - Garland v. DSCC Director et al
November 8, 2016
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations: The Court should DISMISS the complaint with prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and § 1915(e)(2)(B) until the plaintiff satisfies the conditions in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). This dismissal will count as a strike or prior occasion within the meaning 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).4 The Motion to Intervene and/or Implead should be denied as moot. re: 12 (Document Restricted) Sealed Motion to Intervene (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/8/2016) (mem)
December 8, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/8/2016) (ykp)
January 13, 2017
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: plaintiff's 25 Motion to Reconsider De Novo Anew/Hear De Novo. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, which has been liberally construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. 59(e), should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/13/2017) (mcrd)
February 17, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider De Novo Anew/Hear De Novo, received 1/10/2017 (doc. 25), is construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. 59(e), and is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/17/2017) (sss)