Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 
About FDsys
Search Government Publications
Browse Government Publications
FDsys Tutorials and Webinars
  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
Actions
 

16-1287 - Garland v. DSCC Director et al

Download Files
Descriptive Metadata MODS
Authenticity Metadata PREMIS
All Format & Metadata Files ZIP file
Metadata
CategoryMouse over help for Category says The category to which the collection belongs. Search field operator example is category:"Judicial Publications".Judicial Publications
CollectionMouse over help for Collection says The collection to which the document belongs. Typically the same as the publication or series. Search field operator example is collection:uscourts. United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc Class NumberMouse over help for SuDoc Class Number says The SuDoc class number from the U.S. Superintendent of Documents which classifies Government publications by publishing agency. Search field operator example is sudocclass:"JU 4.15:".JU 4.15
Court TypeMouse over help for Court Type says The type of court, such as appellate, district, or bankruptcy. Search field operator example is courttype:district.District
Court NameMouse over help for Court Name says The name of the court. Search field operator example is courtname:"United States District Court District of Maryland".United States District Court Northern District of Texas
CircuitMouse over help for Circuit says There are currently 11 circuits, plus the D.C. and Federal circuits. Search field operator example is circuit:4th. 5th
Office LocationMouse over help for Office Location says The city where the office is located. Search field operator example is officelocation:Baltimore.Dallas
Case TypeMouse over help for Case Type says District cases can either be criminal or civil. Search field operator example is casetype:criminal. civil
Nature of SuitMouse over help for Nature of Suit says The nature of the suit for appellate or district cases. Search field operator example is naturesuit:foreclosure. The CIT uses statutory references to 28 U.S.C. 1581-1584 in lieu of nature of suit codes. Search field operator example is naturesuit:antidumping.Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. defendant)
CauseMouse over help for Cause says The cause in a district court case. Search field operator example is cause:"Right to Privacy Act".42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Party NamesMouse over help for Party Names says The names of the parties in the case. Search field operator example is partyname:"State of Rhode Island".Chief US Marshal, Defendant
DCSS Designation and Sentence Comp. Ctr, Defendant
DSCC Director, Defendant
FCI Elkton and Records Dept., Defendant
Peter Tobin, Defendant
U.S. Marshal Service Columbus office, Defendant
Warden, Defendant
Time Credit Lifeline, Movant
Delaino Garland, Plaintiff
Document in Context
16-1287 - Garland v. DSCC Director et al
More
November 8, 2016
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations: The Court should DISMISS the complaint with prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and § 1915(e)(2)(B) until the plaintiff satisfies the conditions in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). This dismissal will count as a strike or prior occasion within the meaning 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).4 The Motion to Intervene and/or Implead should be denied as moot. re: 12 (Document Restricted) Sealed Motion to Intervene (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/8/2016) (mem)
December 8, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 12/8/2016) (ykp)
January 13, 2017
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: plaintiff's 25 Motion to Reconsider De Novo Anew/Hear De Novo. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, which has been liberally construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. 59(e), should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/13/2017) (mcrd)
February 17, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider De Novo Anew/Hear De Novo, received 1/10/2017 (doc. 25), is construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed. R. Civ. 59(e), and is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 2/17/2017) (sss)