United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2018-04-19
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2018-04-18
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833
P0b002ee19a16b987
DGPO
2018-04-19
2021-04-12
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833
District
txnd
5th
Texas
2482
3:16-cv-02833
Dallas
civil
530
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
3:16-cv-02833
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833
JU 4.15
3:16-cv-02833;16-2833
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
5th Circuit
Dallas
U.S. Courts
author
aut
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Lorie
Respondent
Zachary Don Gillaspie
Gillaspie
Zachary
Petitioner
Warden Garza
Warden Garza
Respondent
Warden Mackey
Warden Mackey
Respondent
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833
District
txnd
5th
Texas
2482
3:16-cv-02833
Dallas
civil
530
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Texas
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: petitioner's 45 Motion for Default Judgement. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the motion should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/9/2017) (mcrd)
0
2017-06-09
D09002ee1acddc2a9
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-0
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-0.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-0
0
2017-06-09
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: petitioner's 45 Motion for Default Judgement. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the motion should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/9/2017) (mcrd)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Order Accepting 46 Findings and Recommendations on Motion: 45 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Zachary Don Gillaspie is denied. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/18/2017) (epm)
1
2017-07-18
D09002ee1acddc2aa
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-1
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_1.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-1
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-1.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-1
1
2017-07-18
Order Accepting 46 Findings and Recommendations on Motion: 45 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Zachary Don Gillaspie is denied. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/18/2017) (epm)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: This petition for writ of habeas corpus should be DENIED with prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/7/2017) (mcrd)
2
2017-08-07
D09002ee1acddc247
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-2
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_2.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-2
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-2.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-2
2
2017-08-07
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: This petition for writ of habeas corpus should be DENIED with prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/7/2017) (mcrd)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Order Accepting 53 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 8/30/2017) (rekc)
3
2017-08-30
D09002ee1acddc244
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-3
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_3.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-3
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-3.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-3
3
2017-08-30
Order Accepting 53 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 8/30/2017) (rekc)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 57 "Due Process Objection(s)" filed by Zachary Don Gillaspie. Petitioner's motion should be construed as a Rule 59(e) motion and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/14/2017) (aaa)
4
2017-09-14
D09002ee1acddc2a6
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-4
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_4.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-4
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-4.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-4
4
2017-09-14
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 57 "Due Process Objection(s)" filed by Zachary Don Gillaspie. Petitioner's motion should be construed as a Rule 59(e) motion and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/14/2017) (aaa)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
ORDER ACCEPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The petitioner's motion is construed as arising under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/4/2017) (sss)
5
2017-10-04
D09002ee1acddc2a7
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-5
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_5.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-5
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-5.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-5
5
2017-10-04
ORDER ACCEPTING 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The petitioner's motion is construed as arising under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) and is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/4/2017) (sss)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Amended Finding, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the petitioner's Rule 59(b) Motion for a New Trial, received on 10/17/2017 (doc. 61), and Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody and Extension of Question Eleven and Twenty, received on 11/13/2017 (docs. 63, 64). Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the post-judgment filings should be construed as a successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, opened as a new case, and TRANSFERRED to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/20/2017) (mcrd)
6
2017-11-20
D09002ee1acddc2a8
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-6
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_6.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-6
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-6.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-6
6
2017-11-20
Amended Finding, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the petitioner's Rule 59(b) Motion for a New Trial, received on 10/17/2017 (doc. 61), and Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody and Extension of Question Eleven and Twenty, received on 11/13/2017 (docs. 63, 64). Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the post-judgment filings should be construed as a successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, opened as a new case, and TRANSFERRED to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/20/2017) (mcrd)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 65 Findings and Recommendations. The petition for habeas corpus is successive and is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [Civil Case #3:18-cv-00023 opened.] (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 1/3/2018) (epm) Modified on 1/5/2018 (epm).
7
2018-01-03
D09002ee1acddc248
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-7
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_7.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-7
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-7.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-7
7
2018-01-03
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 65 Findings and Recommendations. The petition for habeas corpus is successive and is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [Civil Case #3:18-cv-00023 opened.] (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 1/3/2018) (epm) Modified on 1/5/2018 (epm).
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the petitioner's 71 Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 60 Writ of Error Coram Nobis Motion. Petitioner's motion should be construed as a Rule 60(b) motion and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/21/2018) (mcrd)
8
2018-03-21
D09002ee1acddc245
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-8
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_8.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-8
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-8.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-8
8
2018-03-21
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the petitioner's 71 Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 60 Writ of Error Coram Nobis Motion. Petitioner's motion should be construed as a Rule 60(b) motion and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/21/2018) (mcrd)
Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al
Order Accepting 72 Findings and Recommendations. 71 Fed. R. Civ. P. rule 60 'Writ of error/Coram Nobis Motion filed by Zachary Don Gillaspie is construed as arising under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/18/2018) (svc)
9
2018-04-18
D09002ee1acddc246
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-9
txnd-3_16-cv-02833_9.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-9
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-9.pdf
USCOURTS 3:16-cv-02833; Gillaspie v. Warden Mackey et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_16-cv-02833-9
9
2018-04-18
Order Accepting 72 Findings and Recommendations. 71 Fed. R. Civ. P. rule 60 'Writ of error/Coram Nobis Motion filed by Zachary Don Gillaspie is construed as arising under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/18/2018) (svc)