Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-348 - Thomas v. The State of Texas et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-348 - Thomas v. The State of Texas et al
February 13, 2018
PDF | More
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: 38 Defendant Danny Griffith's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint [F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6)]; 56 Defendant Marc Pieroni's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 12(b)1() and (6); 64 Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Opposing Counsel for Marc Pieron[i]; 69 413th District Court Judge William Bosworth, 66th Judicial District Court Judge F.B. McGregor, 18th District Court Judge John Neill, 249th District Court Judge Dennis Wayne Bridewell, and the State of Texas' Motions to Dismiss on the Basis of Official, Qualified, Eleventh Amendment and Judicial Immunity and Absence of Standing; 80 Defendants Johnson County, Texas, Bob Alford, Ken Bartlett, Ronald McBroom, DaleHanna, and Martin Strahan's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and Brief in Support Thereof; and 81 Defendant Greg Gorman's Third Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 12(b)(1) and (6). Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the motions to dismiss should be GRANTED, the plaintiff's remaining claims should be DISMISSED sua sponte for failure to state a claim, and her motion to disqualify should be DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 2/13/2018) (mcrd)
March 12, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING 91 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/12/2018) (ykp)
May 7, 2018
PDF | More
f Civil Procedure and DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 5/7/2018) (mcrd) Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the plaintiff's post-judgment 101 Motion for Emergency Hearing. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the motion should be construed as arising under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules o
June 8, 2018
PDF | More
Order Accepting 102 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge; denying 101 Motion for Emergency Hearing. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 6/8/2018) (zkc)