Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-988 - Starrett v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-988 - Starrett v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
July 24, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 37 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by William Henry Starrett, Jr. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/24/2017) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
August 16, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This court recommends that the district court should grant 9 Motion and 10 Motion. The Court recommends that the district court QUASH Plaintiff's service of process upon Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC and Sandia Corporation and order Plaintiff to effectuate proper service within thirty days of the court's acceptance of these findings. The Court recommends that the the district court DENY Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and allow Defendants to re-file them once Plaintiff has effectuated proper service of process. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul D Stickney on 8/16/2017) (ran)
September 19, 2017
PDF | More
Order Adopting 53 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is ordered that defendants Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC's alternative motion to quash [ECF No. 9] and Sandia Corporation's alternative motion to quash [ECF No. 10] are granted. The court denies without prejudice the motions to dismiss of Lawrence Livermore and Sandia. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 9/19/2017) (rekc)
February 6, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 92 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by William Henry Starrett, Jr. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 2/6/2018) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
March 9, 2018
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court recommends that the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (ECF No. 17), Defendants United States Army, United States Army Special Operations Command, United States Army Civil Affairs & Psychological Operations Command, United States Army Reserve Command, United States Special Operations Command, United States Department of Defense, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, United States Department of Energy, and National Nuclear Security Administration (ECF No. 20), and Texas Military Department (ECF No. 56) be GRANTED. The District Court should DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 3/9/2018) (ykp)
March 19, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 99 Findings and Recommendations on Case; granting 17 Motion to Dismiss; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 3/19/2018) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)