Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-1662 - Li v. Dallas Municipal Court


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-1662 - Li v. Dallas Municipal Court
August 10, 2017
PDF | More
***Vacated per 13 Order*** Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: This case should be dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court, unless the plaintiff submits an amended complaint and either pays the filing fee or submits her completed application to proceed in forma pauperis within the time for objecting to this recommendation, or some other deadline set by the court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/10/2017) (mcrd) Modified on 8/25/2017 (mcrd).
August 25, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: On 8/24/2017, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (See docs. 11, 12.) Accordingly, the 10 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and recommendation for dismissal are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/25/2017) (mcrd)
December 29, 2017
PDF | More
by the court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 12/29/2017) (mcrd) Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the plaintiff's 12 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied, and this case should be dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court, unless the plaintiff pays the filing fee within the time for objecting to this recommendation, or some other deadline set
January 31, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: re: 15 Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The plaintiff's 12 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed August 24, 2017 is DENIED (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 1/31/2018) (svc)