Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

18-1302 - Dulceak v. Berryhill


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
18-1302 - Dulceak v. Berryhill
May 23, 2018
PDF | More
***VACATED PER 7 ORDER***FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Motion re: 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eileen Dulceak. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs 3 should be DENIED. The Court also recommends that the District Court inform Plaintiff that her Complaint will be subject to dismissal without further notice under Rule 41(b), unless Plaintiff pays to the Clerk of Court the applicable filing and administrative fees totaling $400 within seven days of the District Court's Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 5/23/2018) (epm) Modified text on 6/27/2018 (ykp).
June 27, 2018
PDF | More
d on 6/27/2018) (ykp)ORDER: The Court VACATES its May 23, 2018 5 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, and DENIES as moot 3 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherfor