United States Government Publishing Office
publisher
pbl
distributor
dst
United States
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
author
aut
Government Organization
text
government publication
eng
USCOURTS
Judicial Publications
judicial
2018-12-17
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
2018-12-14
monographic
deposited
born digital
JU 4.15
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543
P0b002ee19e29ad90
DGPO
2018-12-17
2021-04-12
USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543
machine generated
eng
fdlp
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543
District
txnd
5th
Texas
2482
3:18-cv-01543
Dallas
civil
830
Patent
28:1338 Patent Infringement
Iron Oak Technologies LLC v. Acer America Corporation et al
3:18-cv-01543
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543
JU 4.15
3:18-cv-01543;18-1543
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
5th Circuit
Dallas
U.S. Courts
author
aut
ACER Inc
ACER Inc
Defendant
Acer America Corporation
Acer America Corporation
Defendant
Gateway Inc
Gateway Inc
Defendant
Iron Oak Technologies LLC
Iron Oak Technologies LLC
Plaintiff
None
None
Defendant
USCOURTS
USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543
District
txnd
5th
Texas
2482
3:18-cv-01543
Dallas
civil
830
Patent
28:1338 Patent Infringement
Texas
Iron Oak Technologies LLC v. Acer America Corporation et al
018. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/5/2018) (sss)ORDER: The 18 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [ECF No. 6] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff has plausibly alleged direct infringement. Plaintiff has failed to plausibly allege induced and contributory infringement. Accordingly, Plaintiff's induced and contributory infringement claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff has leave to amend its pleading, addressing the defects identified, by 7/26/2
0
2018-07-05
D09002ee1acdf10c9
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-0
txnd-3_18-cv-01543_0.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-0
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-0.pdf
USCOURTS 3:18-cv-01543; Iron Oak Technologies LLC v. Acer America Corporation et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-0
0
2018-07-05
018. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/5/2018) (sss)ORDER: The 18 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [ECF No. 6] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff has plausibly alleged direct infringement. Plaintiff has failed to plausibly allege induced and contributory infringement. Accordingly, Plaintiff's induced and contributory infringement claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff has leave to amend its pleading, addressing the defects identified, by 7/26/2
Iron Oak Technologies LLC v. Acer America Corporation et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING [39] Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Damages as to Microsoft's Products. Plaintiff may not recover damages from the Defendants for infringement by Microsoft products or services. Microsoft's declaratory judgment claims are therefore DISMISSED as moot. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 12/14/2018) (aaa)
1
2018-12-14
D09002ee1acdf10ca
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-1
txnd-3_18-cv-01543_1.pdf
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-1
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543/pdf/USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-1.pdf
USCOURTS 3:18-cv-01543; Iron Oak Technologies LLC v. Acer America Corporation et al;
United States District Court Northern District of Texas
Texas
USCOURTS-txnd-3_18-cv-01543-1
1
2018-12-14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING [39] Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Damages as to Microsoft's Products. Plaintiff may not recover damages from the Defendants for infringement by Microsoft products or services. Microsoft's declaratory judgment claims are therefore DISMISSED as moot. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 12/14/2018) (aaa)