Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-133 - Hummel v. Davis

Download Files


Document in Context
16-133 - Hummel v. Davis
January 3, 2018
PDF | More
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Because Petitioner is not entitled to relief on any of his AEDPA claims, the Court DENIES his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 12). In accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and after considering the record in this case, the Court DENIES Petitioner a certificate of appealability because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 33638 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 48384 (2000). If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d)(7). It is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/3/2018) (trt)