Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-003 - Harvin v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-003 - Harvin v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
June 29, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Because Petitioner has not shown that he is entitled to equitable tolling of his time-barred claims relating to his plea of nolo contendere in his habeas petition, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that claims 1 through 5 and 13 through 16 of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 6/29/2017) (plp)
August 2, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, claims 1 through 5 and 13 through 16 of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) are DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/2/2017) (trt) Modified text on 8/3/2017 (skg).
March 1, 2018
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Because Petitioner has not shown that he is entitled to habeas relief, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the remaining claims (612 and 17) of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 3/1/2018) (plp)
May 14, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 44: The Court therefore DENIES the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 5/14/2018) (skg)