Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-006 - Hostetter v. Gillock


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-006 - Hostetter v. Gillock
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Because Plaintiffs' amended pleading superseded their original pleading, on which Defendants' Motions to Dismiss were based, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 5 and 12) be DENIED without prejudice as MOOT. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 3/21/2017) (plp)
April 11, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and hereby accepts them as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 5 and 12) are DENIED without prejudice as MOOT. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/11/2017) (plp)
May 2, 2017
PDF | More
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The undersigned RECOMMENDS that Judge O'Connor DENY Defendant Gillock's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30), GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendant the City of Nocona's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 33), and DISMISS with prejudice Hostetter's claims against the City of Nocona. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 5/2/2017) (plp)
June 1, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in this case (ECF No. 50) should be and is hereby ACCEPTED and Defendant Gillock's objections OVERRULED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Gillock's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30) is DENIED, Defendant the City of Nocona's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiff's claims against the City of Nocona are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/1/2017) (baa)