Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-007 - Stewart v. Tilley et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-007 - Stewart v. Tilley et al
November 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 42, is ACCEPTED IN PART AND NOT ACCEPTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, 38, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is to file a response concerning his Section 1983 claim for the violation of his rights arising under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause on or before December 22, 2017. Plaintiffs response is to concern only that claim and should be limited to 20 pages, not including the caption, signature block, any certificate, or accompanying documents. See W.D. Loc. R. CV-7(e)(3) (allowing 20 pages for responses to dispositive motions). Defendants are ordered to reply to Plaintiffs response, if at all, on or before January 5, 2018. Defendants reply must be no longer than ten pages, exclusive of the caption, signature block, any certificate, or accompanying documents. Id. at R. CV-7(e)(3). Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jch)
March 19, 2018
PDF | More
ORDERED that Stewarts Section 1983 claim for the violation of his Fourteenth Amendment rights is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jch)