Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-071 - Wood v. Cook et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-071 - Wood v. Cook et al
February 4, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE OF PROCESS: The United States Marshals Service is firected to serve a properly issued summons and copy of the Plaintiffs Complaint, along with this Order,upon these Utah Department of Corrections employees. Doug Cook, Kennon Tubbs, and PA Merrill.granting 14 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner). The United States Marshals Service shall serve a summons, a copy of Plaintiffs complaint, and a copy of this Order upon Defendants Doug Cook, P.A Merrill, FNU Tubbs; denying 15 Motion to Dismiss; If service is not granted and the fee is refundable. See order for details. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 2/4/2016. (kpf)
February 4, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER: It is hereby ordered that: If the State is unable to accept service of process for the defendants identified above, the State shall disclose to the USMS any information in its records that may help in identifying, locating completing service of process upon the named defendants. See order for details. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 2/4/2016. (kpf)
April 17, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION and DISMISSAL ORDER: It is therefore ordered that, because he has failed to prosecute his case, Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 04/17/2017. (kpf)
September 20, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER: It is therefore ordered that, because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case, Plaintiffs action is DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 09/20/2017. (kpf)
March 9, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting & Denying in Part 44 Defendant Cook's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Cook's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The only constitutional claim remaining against Defendant Cook in this case is that the fines he assessed were excessive. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within sixty days Defendant Cook must file a motion for summary judgment on the excessive-fine claim. Plaintiff will then have thirty days to respond. For Plaintiff's information and convenience, the Court has attached the procedural rules governing summary-judgment practice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 3/9/18. (dla)
March 22, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Granting 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 03/22/2018. (kpf)