Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-5029 - Hinkley v. Shumate et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-5029 - Hinkley v. Shumate et al
July 3, 2014
PDF | More
JUDGMENT: IS ORDERED this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) regarding his bedding claims. See Vaden v. Summerhill, 449 F.3d 1047, 1050 (9th Cir. 2006); Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2005). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this action is DISMISSED forfailure to state a claim regarding hygiene and sanitation against the named Defendants for which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A (b)(1).(SMP, Case Administrator)
August 8, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Edward F. Shea. (CC, Case Administrator)
August 8, 2016
PDF | More
JUDGMENT in favor of Rod Shumate; against James Hinkley. (CC, Case Administrator)