Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-084 - Widmyer v. Ballard


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-084 - Widmyer v. Ballard
September 7, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE A REPLY. Respondent shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to file any reply he may have to the petitioners response. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 9/7/2010. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF,pro se petitioner via certified mail) (jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/7/2010: # (1) receipt) (jmm).
February 7, 2018
PDF | More
(mh).REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court recommends that the Respondents Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 88 be GRANTED; the Petitioners Motion to Deny Respondents Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 96 be DENIED; and the Petition [ECF No. 1 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, any party may file with the Clerk of Court written objections identifying those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made and the basis for such objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 2/7/18. (Copy to PS Petitioner via cert. mail)(mh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/8/2018: # (1) Certified Mail Return Receipt)
March 28, 2018
PDF | More
y and directs the Clerk to enter a separate judgment order in this matter and remove this case from the Court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/28/18. (Copy PS Petitioner via cert. mail)(mh)MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DKT. NO. 105. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's 105 Report and Recommendation in its entirety; grants Ballard's 88 Motion for Summary Judgment; denies Widmyer's 96 Motion to deny respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment; overrules Widmyer's 112 Objections, denies Wydmyer's 1 Petition and Dismisses this case with prejudice. Further, the Court denies a certificate of appealabilit