[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 43 (Friday, March 6, 2009)]
[Pages 9793-9798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4801]



National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[Docket No. 090219207-9212-01]
RIN 0648-ZC05

NOAA Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration Project Grants

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of funding availability under the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act.


SUMMARY: NOAA delivers funding and technical expertise to restore 
coastal and marine habitats. These habitats support valuable fisheries 
and protected resources, improve the quality of our water, provide 
recreational opportunities for the public's use and enjoyment, and 
buffer our coastal communities from the impacts of storms and sea level 
rise. Projects funded through NOAA have strong on-the-ground habitat 
restoration components that provide social and economic benefits for 
people and their communities in addition to long-term ecological 
habitat improvements. Through this solicitation, NOAA seeks to openly 
compete funding available for habitat restoration under the American 
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Applications should be submitted 
for any project that is to be considered for this funding, even for 
those projects put forth to the Federal Government as examples by 
internal and external restoration partners or submitted as applications 
to other NOAA competitions. Competition will ensure that the most 
beneficial restoration projects are selected to realize significant 
ecological gains (with emphasis on projects that are regionally or 
nationally significant species and ecosystems), fuel America's near-
term economy, and ensure that projects are truly ``shovel-ready.'' 
Proposals selected for funding through this solicitation will be 
implemented through a grant or cooperative agreement, with awards 
dependent upon the amount of funds made available to NOAA for this 
purpose by Congress. NOAA anticipates that up to $170 million may be 
available for coastal and marine habitat restoration; typical awards 
are expected to range between $1.5 million to $10 million. Funds will 
be administered by NOAA's Office of Habitat Conservation.

DATES: Applications must be postmarked, provided to a delivery service, 
or received by www.grants.gov by 11:59 PM EDT on April 6, 2009. Use of 
U.S. mail or another delivery service must be documented with a 
receipt. No facsimile or electronic mail applications will be accepted.

ADDRESSES: Electronic applications are strongly encouraged and are 
available at http://www.grants.gov. Grants.gov requires applicants to 
register with the system prior to submitting an application for the 
first time. This registration process can take over a week and involves 
multiple steps. In order to allow sufficient time for this process, 
prospective applicants should register as soon as they decide to apply, 
even if not yet ready to submit an application. If an applicant is 
having difficulty downloading the application forms from Grants.gov, 
contact Grants.gov customer support at 1-800-518-4726 or 
support@grants.gov. If an applicant is having difficulty with 
Grants.gov, the applicant should contact Craig Woolcott at 
Craig.Woolcott@noaa.gov, or by phone at 301-713-0174, or by mail at 
NOAA Fisheries, Office of Habitat Conservation (F/HC3), 1315 East West 
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Woolcott or Melanie Gange at 
(301) 713-0174, or by e-mail at Craig.Woolcott@noaa.gov or 
Melanie.Gange@noaa.gov. Prospective applicants are invited to contact 
NOAA staff before submitting an application to discuss whether their 
project ideas are within the scope of the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act's objectives and NOAA's mission and goals.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The principal objective of these NOAA 
Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration Project Grants is to provide 
Federal financial and technical assistance to ``ready-to-go'' (shovel-
ready) projects that meet NOAA's mission to restore marine and coastal 
habitats and that will result in near-immediate stimulation of local 
United States (U.S.) economies through the creation or retention of 
restoration-related jobs for work in U.S. jurisdictions.
    NOAA seeks to support projects that will result in on-the-ground 
restoration of marine and coastal habitat (including Great Lakes 
habitat) that are aligned with the objectives of the American Recovery 
and Reinvestment Act. Restoration for the purposes of this solicitation 
will be broadly inclusive. Restoration includes, but is not limited to, 
activities that contribute to the return

[[Page 9794]]

of degraded or altered marine, estuarine, coastal, and freshwater 
(diadromous fish) habitats to a close approximation of their function 
prior to disturbance. Habitat restoration activities that produce 
ecologically significant habitat features to create buffers or ``green 
infrastructure'' that serve to protect coastal communities from sea 
level rise, coastal storms and flooding, or that provide adaptation to 
climate change will also be considered. The program priorities for this 
opportunity primarily support NOAA's ``Ecosystems'' mission support 
goal of ``Protect, Restore, and Manage Use of Coastal and Ocean 
Resources through Ecosystem-Based Management.''
    NOAA will emphasize the selection of mid-scale, shovel-ready 
restoration projects that will (1) yield significant ecological 
benefits with emphasis on regionally or nationally significant species 
and ecosystems, and (2) stimulate local economies through the creation 
or retention of restoration-related jobs for work in U.S. 
jurisdictions. Mid-scale projects are anticipated to be those with a 
total project cost (NOAA award plus any match or leverage) over $1.5 
million. Shovel-ready projects are expected to be those where 
feasibility studies and/or other baseline information required for a 
design are available, where required consultations and permits, if not 
in-hand, are either in progress or there is reasonable assurance 
provided that they can be attained quickly, and where NEPA analysis and 
any environmental permits and authorizations are finished or can be 
expeditiously completed, so that projects can be implemented shortly 
after funding is made available (see NEPA details below, and in Section 
VI.B.2 of the FFO).
    High priority will be given to applications for projects that:
     Have the greatest potential to achieve ecological benefits 
and maximize jobs creation/preservation;
     Can begin within the first 90 days of the award start 
     Can be completed within 12-18 months;
     Have the greatest potential to be sustainable and provide 
lasting benefits of regional or national significance;
     Identify specific goals and outcomes, with appropriate 
ecological and economic performance metrics;
     Propose sufficient, cost-effective monitoring appropriate 
to the scope and scale of the project to evaluate a project's benefits;
     Are consistent with NOAA species recovery planning efforts 
if located in areas where recovery planning efforts for Endangered 
Species Act listed species are underway;
     Request funds primarily to implement physical, on-the-
ground coastal habitat restoration (as opposed to funds for general 
program support, overhead and travel).

Because the purpose of these funds is to quickly stimulate local U.S. 
economies through habitat restoration, applications for projects 
lacking opportunity to generate employment through restoration 
implementation or provide long-term economic benefits will not compete 
well and are discouraged.
    The following are exemplary of the types of coastal and marine 
habitats and projects that will receive priority for restoration 
funding consideration:
     Diadromous fish habitat, particularly projects that remove 
in-stream migration barriers or create/restore habitats limiting 
     Shellfish habitat restoration/creation, for the broad 
ecological benefits and ecosystem services they provide;
     Coral reefs, through projects that address land-based 
sources of pollution, recovery from disturbance or disease, or that 
promote coral recruitment and/or recovery;
     Coastal wetlands, through shoreline restoration or 
hydrological reconnection;
     Projects that seek to restore coastal and marine habitat 
to recover threatened or endangered species or for species of concern;
     Projects that provide protection for communities and 
infrastructure through habitat restoration to improve coastal 
resiliency to storms and coastal flooding;
     Projects that improve the potential for coastal habitat to 
respond to climate change through restoration or protection of 
transition zones that provide room for habitat migration with sea level 
     Projects that seek to address the problem of marine debris 
accumulation in coastal and marine habitats;
     Projects that support conservation corps type activities 
to provide employment, education and training through restoration of 
coastal and marine habitat; and
     Restoration of Great Lakes habitats within Areas of 
Concern addressing beneficial use impairments to loss of fish and 
wildlife habitat and/or degradation of benthos.
    Safety is a critical consideration for restoration project 
implementation. If an application is selected, the grantee must have a 
written safety plan for all project-related activities, including 
management of volunteers (if applicable). The safety plan should 
consider safety at the site during and after project construction, and 
take into account potential safety concerns with regard to the current 
and future use of the site.

Electronic Access

    The full text of the Federal Funding Opportunity (FFO) announcement 
for this program can be accessed via the Grants.gov web site at http://www.grants.gov (FFO number: NOAA-NMFS-HCPO-2009-2001709). The FFO will 
also be available by contacting the program officials identified under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Applicants must comply with all 
requirements contained in the FFO.

Statutory Authority

    The Secretary of Commerce is authorized under the following 
statutes to provide grants and cooperative agreements for habitat 
     Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 16 U.S.C. 661, as 
amended by the Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970;
     Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management 
Reauthorization Act of 2006, 16 U.S.C. 1891a;
     Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction Act, 33 
U.S.C. 1951 et seq.;
     Coral Reef Conservation Act of 2000, 16 U.S.C. 6403;
     Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 
1451 et seq.;
     National Marine Sanctuaries Act, 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.;
     Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1382; and
     Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1535.
    Catalogue of Domestic Federal Assistance (CFDA) Number: 11.463, 
Habitat Conservation.

Funding Availability

    NOAA anticipates that up to $170 million may be available for 
coastal and marine habitat restoration; typical awards are expected to 
range between $1.5 million and $10 million. NOAA will not accept 
applications requesting more than $20 million or less than $500,000 
under this solicitation. There is no guarantee that sufficient funds 
will be available to make awards for all applications. The number of 
awards to be made as a result of this solicitation will depend on the 
number of eligible applications received, the amount of funds requested 
for habitat restoration projects by the applicants, the merit and 
ranking of the applications, the amount of funds made available by 

[[Page 9795]]

and the amount of funding, if any, put toward American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act projects outside this solicitation.
    NOAA will consider funding more than one project under a single 
application and/or award. Applicants that bundle projects in a single 
application should ensure that there is sufficient detail for each 
project as per the guidelines and information requirements listed in 
this document if an application is to be competitive; all projects in 
the bundle should be able to be initiated quickly as well as completed 
within the award period specified below. Projects that are sufficiently 
different in nature so that they cannot be succinctly described within 
the narrative page limit requirements may be most competitive as 
individual applications and should be submitted as such.
    The exact amount of funds that may be awarded will be determined in 
pre-award negotiations between the applicant and NOAA representatives. 
Publication of this document does not obligate NOAA to award any 
specific project or obligate all or any parts of any available funds. 
Pre-award costs are generally unallowable. If applicants incur any 
costs prior to an award being made, they do so at their own risk of not 
being reimbursed by the government. There is no obligation on the part 
of NOAA to cover pre-award costs unless approved by the Grants Officer 
as part of the terms when the award is made.


    Eligible applicants are institutions of higher education, non-
profits, commercial (for profit) organizations, U.S. Territories, and 
state, local and Indian tribal governments. Applications from Federal 
agencies or employees of Federal agencies will not be considered. 
Federal agencies are strongly encouraged to work with states, non-
governmental organizations, municipal and county governments, 
conservation corps organizations and others that are eligible to apply.
    The Department of Commerce/National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration (DOC/NOAA) is strongly committed to broadening the 
participation of historically black colleges and universities, 
Hispanic-serving institutions, tribal colleges and universities, and 
institutions that work in under-served areas. NOAA encourages 
applications involving any of the above institutions.

Cost Sharing Requirements

    There is no statutory matching requirement for this funding.

Evaluation and Selection Procedures

    The evaluation criteria, review process and selection factors that 
apply to eligible applications under this funding opportunity are 
below. Further information about the application requirements, 
evaluation and selection process can be found in the FFO.

Evaluation Criteria for Projects

    Reviewers will assign scores to applications ranging from 0 to 50 
points based on the following five standard NOAA evaluation criteria 
and respective weights specified below. Applications that best address 
these criteria will be most competitive.
    1. Importance and Applicability of Proposal (20 points): This 
criterion ascertains whether there is intrinsic value in the proposed 
work and/or relevance to NOAA, Federal, regional, state or local 
activities. For the NOAA Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration Project 
Grants competition, applications will be evaluated based on the 
     The potential of an application to meet the intent of the 
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to readily maximize jobs created 
or maintained through implementation of shovel-ready coastal and marine 
habitat restoration projects, and to improve the short- and long-term 
economic condition of an area (e.g., increased fisheries benefits, 
increased tourism and recreation, etc.), based on the significance of 
the anticipated outcomes of the project. This includes the extent to 
which the project(s) will deliver tangible, specific results that are 
measurable with respect to the number, type, speed, and duration (in 
labor hours) of jobs created or maintained directly resulting from the 
project.(8 points)
     The potential of an application to meet NOAA's mission to 
protect and restore marine and coastal habitats, based on the 
significance of the anticipated ecological benefits. This includes the 
extent to which the project will deliver tangible, specific results 
that are measurable and relevant to NOAA performance measures such as 
acres restored, stream miles opened for fish passage, tonnage of marine 
debris removed, and similar outputs that directly result from the 
project. (8 points)
     The potential of the project to be sustainable and provide 
lasting benefits of regional or national significance for coastal and 
marine habitats. Reviewers will be looking for evidence that 1) there 
is demonstrated support for the project in the form of a letter from 
partners, local entities, and/or state and local governments, and a 
letter of commitment from the appropriate resource agency personnel for 
a project in permanently protected areas, or from the affected 
landowner for a project on private property, that provides assurance of 
support and dedication to protecting the project for its useful life 
(letter of support, conservation easement, or significant financial or 
other in-kind investment); 2) the applicant has chosen the most self-
sustaining restoration technique that accomplishes the project's goals; 
and/or 3) the project will remove a habitat or species impact that will 
not re-occur. (4 points)
    2. Technical/Scientific Merit (12 points): This criterion assesses 
whether the approach is technically sound and/or innovative, if the 
methods are appropriate, and whether there are clear project goals and 
objectives. For the NOAA Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration Project 
Grants competition, applications will be evaluated based on the 
     The extent to which the applicant has described a 
realistic implementation plan, beginning within the first 90 days of 
the award start date, and whether the project is likely to be fully 
achievable within 12-18 months. Applications that provide assurance 
that implementation of the project will meet all Federal, state and 
local environmental laws, and that applicable permits and/or approvals 
are in hand or will be obtained expeditiously, so that on-the-ground 
activities will begin soon after the project's proposed start date are 
likely to score higher(see NEPA details in Section VI.B.2 of the FFO). 
Applications submitted with evidence of completed environmental 
assessments, completed consultations and/or secured permits, if 
applicable, will score higher. (5 points)
     The overall feasibility of the project from a 
socioeconomic perspective. This includes the likelihood that a project 
is able to meet stated employment targets and whether there is an 
effective mechanism to evaluate project success, including adequate and 
meaningful performance measures for economic benefits, for which 
results will be available within and following the award period. Those 
projects that identify specific quantifiable targets achievable during 
the award period are likely to score higher. (3 points)
     The overall technical feasibility of the project from a 
biological and engineering perspective, including whether the proposed 
approach is technically sound, safe, and uses appropriate methods and 
personnel. This includes the likelihood that a

[[Page 9796]]

project is able to achieve stated project goals and objectives on an 
ecological basis, and whether there is an effective mechanism to 
evaluate project performance (e.g., sufficient, cost-effective 
monitoring appropriate to the scope and scale of the project), for 
which results will be available within and following the award period. 
Those projects that identify specific quantifiable targets, achievable 
during the award period, are likely to score higher. For projects 
requiring maintenance to assure success/proper function, the adequacy 
of the long-term operation and/or maintenance plan will be considered. 
(4 points)
    3. Overall Qualifications of Applicants (6 points): This criterion 
ascertains whether the applicant possesses the necessary education, 
experience, training, facilities, and administrative resources to 
accomplish the proposed work. For the NOAA Coastal and Marine Habitat 
Restoration Project Grants competition, applications will be evaluated 
based on the following:
     The capacity/knowledge of the applicant and associated 
project personnel to conduct the scope and scale of the proposed work, 
as indicated by the qualifications and past experience of the project 
leaders and/or partners in designing, implementing and effectively 
managing and overseeing projects that restore marine and coastal 
habitats. Proposals that require engineering decision making should 
highlight the qualifications and experience of the designer/engineer. 
Applicants are encouraged to reference examples of projects similar in 
scope and nature that have been successfully completed by the 
implementation team. (4 points)
     The facilities/equipment and/or administrative resources 
and capabilities available to the applicant, or that will be secured to 
support and successfully manage the restoration work and grant 
responsibilities. (2 points)
    4. Project Costs (10 points): This criterion evaluates the budget 
to determine if it is realistic and commensurate with the project needs 
and time-frame. For the NOAA Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration 
Project Grants competition, applications will be evaluated on the 
     Whether the proposed budget is cost-effective and 
realistic, based on the applicant's stated objectives, time frame, and 
amount of overall project budget already secured from other sources. 
Applications will be evaluated based on the percentage of funds 
requested that will be dedicated to all phases of project 
implementation including physical, on-the-ground coastal habitat 
restoration, compared to the percentage for general program support, 
overhead and travel. The degree to which funding for salaries will 
support staff directly involved in accomplishing the restoration work, 
as evidenced by a detailed breakdown of personnel hours and costs by 
task, with appropriate NAICS code data that indicates the primary 
activity of businesses/partners involved in the restoration work, will 
be evaluated. Requests for equipment (any single piece of equipment 
costing $5,000 or more) will be evaluated on how strongly tied the 
equipment is to achieving on-the-ground habitat restoration and on the 
adequacy of lease versus buy comparisons in justifying the need for 
purchase. (5 points)
     Whether the proposed budget is sufficiently detailed, with 
appropriate budget breakdown and justification of Federal and any non-
Federal shares by object class as listed on form SF-424A. If funding 
will be used to complete part of a larger project, a budget overview 
for the entire project should be provided to allow the selecting 
official to make an informed determination of a project's readiness. (3 
     Whether an applicant can leverage the Federal investment 
through matching contributions and/or partnerships. Applicants that 
propose to use independent sources of funds for in-depth evaluation and 
monitoring of long-term ecological and/or socioeconomic impacts of a 
project outside the award period will receive full points for this sub-
criterion. NOAA encourages applicants to provide matching contributions 
and work with partners to improve cost-effectiveness; however, match is 
not required. (2 points)
    5. Outreach and Education (2 points): NOAA assesses whether the 
project provides a focused and effective education and outreach 
strategy regarding NOAA's mission to protect the Nation's natural 
resources. For the NOAA Coastal and Marine Habitat Restoration Project 
Grants competition, applications will be evaluated on the following:
     Public outreach as it relates to the proposed project, 
including plans to disseminate information on project goals, results, 
project partners, jobs created or maintained; sources of funding and 
other support provided, such as the involvement of project partners; 
and the potential for the proposed project to encourage future 
restoration and protection of marine and coastal habitats or complement 
other local restoration or conservation activities. (2 points)

Review and Selection Process

    Applications will undergo an initial administrative review to 
determine if they are eligible and complete. Eligible applications will 
then undergo a technical review, ranking, and selection process to 
determine how well they meet the stated aims of the American Recovery 
and Reinvestment Act and the mission and goals of NOAA.
    Eligible applications for habitat restoration projects will be 
evaluated by at least three individual technical reviewers according to 
the criteria and weights described in this solicitation. Each technical 
reviewer will independently evaluate each project and provide an 
individual score. No consensus advice will be provided by these 
reviewers. Applications will likely be subject to a subsequent panel 
review. A panel review is dependent on the constraints surrounding the 
Act and may be forgone. If a panel review is not convened, the 
application ranking, technical review comments and scores will be 
provided to the Selecting Official (SO). If a panel is convened, the 
FFO, technical ranking, top ranked applications, and technical review 
comments and scores will be provided to a panel whose members will not 
have participated as technical reviewers. The panel will be comprised 
of Federal employees, and may convene in person, or by teleconference, 
video conference or other electronic means, to discuss the applications 
and consider technical reviewer comments. Prior to the panel 
discussion, each member of the panel will independently assign a 
numerical rating between 1 and 4 for each application according to the 
following scale:
    1 -- Marginal; application partially meets some of the evaluation 
criteria (See Evaluation Criteria above and section V.A. of the FFO) 
but does not address program priorities outlined in the FFO.
    2 -- Fair; application adequately meets some of the evaluation 
criteria (See Evaluation Criteria above and section V.A. of the FFO) 
and sufficiently addresses a program priority outlined in the FFO.
    3 -- Good; application thoroughly meets much of the evaluation 
criteria (See Evaluation Criteria above and section V.A. of the FFO) 
and addresses program priorities outlined in the FFO.
    4 -- Excellent; application fully meets most of the evaluation 
criteria (See Evaluation Criteria above and section V.A. of the FFO) 
and exceptionally

[[Page 9797]]

addresses program priorities outlined in the FFO.
    Panel member scores will be averaged and an interim ranking will 
result which will be presented to the panel for discussion, with the 
goal of reaching consensus on the applications to be recommended for 
funding. After discussing the applications, panelists will again assign 
a numerical rating between 1 and 4 (as described above) for each 
application, scores will be averaged, and a final project ranking 
developed. The final ranking from the panel will be presented to the SO 
and should be the primary consideration by the SO in deciding which 
applications will be recommended to the NOAA Grants Officer.

Selection Factors for Projects

    The SO anticipates recommending applications for funding in rank 
order unless an application is justified to be selected out of rank 
order based upon one or more of the following selection factors:
    (1) Availability of funding;
    (2) Balance/distribution of funds: a) geographically, b) by type of 
institutions, c) by type of partners, d) by research areas, e) by 
project types;
    (3) Whether this project duplicates other projects funded or 
considered for funding by NOAA or other Federal agencies;
    (4) Program priorities and policy factors set out in section I.A 
and I.B of the FFO;
    (5) An applicant's prior award performance;
    (6) Partnerships and/or participation of targeted groups; and
    (7) Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a NEPA 
determination and draft necessary documentation before recommendations 
for funding are made to the NOAA Grants Officer.
    Successful applicants may be asked to modify work plans or budgets, 
and provide supplemental information required by the agency prior to 
final approval of an award.
    Successful applicants should expect that information about their 
projects and anticipated and realized economic impacts will be posted 
on Recovery.gov, a White House-managed website established for the 
purpose of transparency and oversight. Federal agencies expect to be 
obligated to publish their plans for expenditure of American Recovery 
and Reinvestment Act funds on this website, including announcements for 
grant competitions, details on awards made with these funds, and 
performance and accountability information on funded projects. 
Recipients of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds will be 
required to comply with Section 1606 of the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act regarding wage rate requirements, and Section 1605 
regarding the use of American iron, steel, and manufactured goods for 
applicable project types (see Application and Submission Information in 
Section IV.B.2 of the FFO). Recipients will also need to assist NOAA in 
meeting mandatory reporting requirements under Title XV., Section 1512 
(Reports on Use of Funds), of the American Recovery and Reinvestment 
Act (see Reporting Requirements details in Section VI.C of the FFO). 
Initial guidance to Federal agencies for implementing American Recovery 
and Reinvestment Act programs, including reporting requirements for 
agencies, is provided in OMB Memorandum M-09-10 (February 18, 2009). 
Additional guidance may be forthcoming related to responsibilities of 
recipients of grants and cooperative agreements.

Intergovernmental Review

    Applications submitted by state and local governments are subject 
to the provisions of Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review 
of Federal Programs.'' Any applicant submitting an application for 
funding is required to complete item 16 on SF-424 regarding clearance 
by the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) established as a result of 
EO 12372. To find out and comply with a State's process under EO 12372, 
the names, addresses and phone numbers of participating SPOCs is listed 
in the Office of Management and Budget's home page at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.

Limitation of Liability

    In no event will NOAA or the Department of Commerce be responsible 
for proposal preparation costs if these programs fail to receive 
funding or are cancelled because of other agency priorities. 
Publication of this announcement does not obligate NOAA to award any 
specific project or to obligate any available funds.

National Environmental Policy Act

    NOAA must analyze the potential environmental impacts, as required 
by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant projects 
or proposals which are seeking NOAA funding. Detailed information on 
NOAA compliance with NEPA can be found at the following NOAA NEPA 
website: http://www.nepa.noaa.gov/, including NOAA Administrative Order 
216-6 for NEPA, and the Council on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) 
implementation regulations. Consequently, as part of an applicant's 
package, and under their description of their program activities, 
applicants are required to provide detailed information on the 
activities to be conducted, safety concerns, locations, sites, species 
and habitat to be affected, possible construction activities, and any 
environmental concerns that may exist (e.g., the use and disposal of 
hazardous or toxic chemicals, introduction of non-indigenous species, 
impacts to endangered and threatened species, aquaculture projects, and 
impacts to coral reef systems).
    It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary 
Federal, state, and local government permits and approvals where 
necessary for the proposed work to be conducted. Applicants are 
expected to design their projects so that they minimize the potential 
for adverse impacts to the environment. Applicants will also be 
required to cooperate with NOAA in identifying feasible measures to 
reduce or avoid any identified adverse environmental impacts of their 
proposed project. The failure to do so shall be grounds for not 
awarding a grant. Documentation of requests/completion of required 
environmental authorizations and permits, including Endangered Species 
Act or Marine Mammal Protection Act authorizations, if applicable, 
should be included in the application package. Applications will be 
reviewed to ensure that they contain sufficient information to allow 
NOAA staff to conduct a NEPA analysis so that appropriate NEPA 
documentation, required as part of the application package, can be 
submitted to the NOAA Grants Management Division along with the 
recommendation for funding for selected applications.
    Applicants proposing restoration activities that cannot be 
categorically excluded from further NEPA analysis, or that are not 
covered by the NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program 
Environmental Assessment (PEA) and Finding of No Significant Impact 
(FONSI) or Supplemental PEA and FONSI, or whose activities are not 
covered under another agency's NEPA compliance procedures that can be 
analyzed and adopted for use by NOAA, will be informed after the 
technical review stage to determine if NEPA compliance and other 
requirements can otherwise be expeditiously met so that a project can 
proceed within the timeframes anticipated under American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act. The CRP PEA and FONSI can be found at: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/recovery.

[[Page 9798]]

    If additional information is required after an application is 
accepted, funds can be withheld by the Grants Officer under a special 
award condition requiring the recipient to submit additional 
environmental law compliance information sufficient to enable NOAA to 
make an assessment on any impacts that a project may have on the 
environment and to verify compliance with any environmental laws.

The Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements for 
Grants and Cooperative Agreements

    Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements for 
Grants and Cooperative Agreements contained in the Federal Register 
notice of February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7696) are applicable to this 

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This document contains collection-of-information requirements 
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The use of Standard Forms 
424, 424A, 424B, SF-LLL, and CD-346 has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the respective control numbers 0348-
0043, 0348-0044, 0348-0040, 0348-0046, and 0605-0001. Notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, no person is required to, nor shall a 
person be subject to penalty for failure to comply with, a collection 
of information subject to the requirements of the PRA unless that 
collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control 

Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Impact Review)

    This notice has been determined to be not significant for purposes 
of the Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 12132 (Federalism)

    It has been determined that this notice does not contain policies 
with Federalism implications as that term is defined in Executive Order 

Administrative Procedure Act/Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Prior notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required 
by the Administrative Procedure Act or any other law for rules 
concerning public property, loans, grants, benefits, and contracts (5 
U.S.C. 553(a)(2)). Because notice and opportunity for comment are not 
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other law, the analytical 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 
are not applicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis has 
not been prepared.

    Dated: March 2, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
[FR Doc. E9-4801 Filed 3-5-09; 8:45 am]